Gendered risk perceptions and structural barriers to sustainable pest management: evidence from Uganda’s tomato value chain

dc.contributor.authorAlex Mayamba
dc.contributor.authorBenson Mutuku
dc.contributor.authorOscar Ingasia Ayuya
dc.contributor.authorMonica Kansiime
dc.contributor.authorMelanie Bateman
dc.contributor.authorSandra Phelps
dc.contributor.authorChristine Alokit
dc.contributor.authorLilian Owembabazi
dc.contributor.authorCaroline Aliamo
dc.contributor.authorMary Bundi
dc.contributor.authorWillis Ochilo
dc.contributor.authorCosmas Kweyu Lutomia
dc.contributor.authorArnold Otieno Jong
dc.contributor.authorGetrude Okutoyi Alworah
dc.date.accessioned2026-10-03T13:59:33Z
dc.date.issued2025-11-25
dc.description.abstractSustainable pest management amid the intensifying adverse effects of climate change is critical to the resilience of agrifood systems. Yet the transition to low-risk and sustainable pest management practices, which often unfolds within gendered and generational constraints, remains limited in sub-Saharan Africa. This study aimed to examine how risk perceptions of pesticides influence pest management decisions among 584 men, women, youth, and non-youth farmers in five regions of Uganda. While chemical pesticides were broadly perceived as high-risk, farmers continued to use them due to structural constraints, such as market pressures, limited access to low-risk alternatives, and gendered decision-making dynamics. Biopesticides were perceived as low risk but remained underutilized, particularly among women and youth. Barriers to the use of biopesticides included affordability, limited availability, inadequate advisory services, and insufficient promotion of biopesticides as a safer alternative to chemical pesticides. The results indicated that risk awareness alone does not necessarily translate into the adoption of low-risk and sustainable pest management practices. Interventions must address both supply-side constraints and power asymmetries to strengthen the resilience and agency of marginalized groups within climate-vulnerable food systems.
dc.description.sponsorshipThe author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article. The study was supported by Centre for Agriculture Biosciences International (CABI), an international intergovernmental not-for-profit organization, gratefully acknowledges the generous support received from our many donors, sponsors, and partners. We thank our Member Countries for their vital financial and strategic contributions. These donors include UKAID, Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation SDC, Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research, Ministry of the Foreign Affairs of the Netherlands and Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs (MARA).
dc.identifier.citationMayamba A, Mutuku B, Ayuya OI, Kansiime M, Bateman M, Phelps S, Alokit C, Owembabazi L, Aliamo C, Bundi M, Ochilo W, Bitange N, Lutomia CK, Jong AO and Alworah GO (2025) Gendered risk perceptions and structural barriers to sustainable pest management: evidence from Uganda’s tomato value chain. Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 9:1656739. doi: 10.3389/fsufs.2025.1656739
dc.identifier.uri10.3389/fsufs.2025.1656739
dc.identifier.urihttps://researchspace.naro.go.ug/handle/123456789/554
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherFront. Sustain. Food Syst.
dc.subjectclimate-smart agriculture
dc.subjectgender
dc.subjectyouth
dc.subjectpesticides
dc.subjectgendered risk perception
dc.subjectpest management
dc.subjectbiopesticides
dc.subjectsustainability
dc.titleGendered risk perceptions and structural barriers to sustainable pest management: evidence from Uganda’s tomato value chain
dc.typeArticle

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Gendered_risk_perceptions_and_structural_barriers_.pdf
Size:
2.03 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed to upon submission
Description:

Collections