The tricot approach: an agile framework for decentralized on‐farm testing supported by citizen science. A retrospective

dc.contributor.authorde Sousa Kauê
dc.contributor.authorJacob van Etten
dc.contributor.authorRhys Manners
dc.contributor.authorErna Abidin
dc.contributor.authorRekiya O. Abdulmalik
dc.contributor.authorBello Abolore
dc.contributor.authorKwabena Acheremu
dc.contributor.authorAngudubo Stephen
dc.contributor.authorAmilcar Aguilar
dc.contributor.authorArnaud Elizabeth
dc.contributor.authorBabu Adventina
dc.contributor.authorMirna Barrios
dc.contributor.authorGrecia Benavente
dc.contributor.authorBoukar Ousmane
dc.contributor.authorJill E. Cairns
dc.contributor.authorEdward Carey
dc.contributor.authorHappy Daudi
dc.contributor.authorDawud Maryam
dc.contributor.authorEdughaen Gospel
dc.contributor.authorEllison James
dc.contributor.authorEsuma Williams
dc.contributor.authorSanusi Gaya Mohammed
dc.contributor.authorJeske van de Gevel
dc.contributor.authorGomez Marvin
dc.contributor.authorJoost van Heerwaarden
dc.contributor.authorIragaba Paula
dc.contributor.authorKadege Edith
dc.contributor.authorTeshale M. Assefa
dc.contributor.authorKalemera Sylvia
dc.contributor.authorKasubiri Fadhili Salum
dc.contributor.authorKawuki Robert
dc.contributor.authorYosef Gebrehawaryat Kidane
dc.contributor.authorKilango Michael
dc.contributor.authorKulembeka Heneriko
dc.contributor.authorAdofo Kwadwo
dc.contributor.authorMadriz Brandon
dc.contributor.authorMasumba Ester
dc.contributor.authorMbiu Julius
dc.contributor.authorMendes Thiago
dc.contributor.authorMüller Anna
dc.contributor.authorMukani Moyo
dc.contributor.authorKiddo Mtunda
dc.contributor.authorTawanda Muzhingi
dc.contributor.authorMuungani Dean
dc.contributor.authorMwenda Emmanuel T.
dc.contributor.authorGanga Rao V. P. R. Nadigatla
dc.contributor.authorNanyonjo Ann Ritah
dc.contributor.authorSognigbé N’Danikou
dc.contributor.authorAthanase Nduwumuremyi
dc.contributor.authorNshimiyimana Jean Claude
dc.contributor.authorNuwamanya Ephraim
dc.contributor.authorNyirahabimana Hyacinthe
dc.contributor.authorOccelli Martina
dc.contributor.authorOlamide Olaosebikan
dc.contributor.authorObia Ongom Patrick
dc.contributor.authorOrtiz‐Crespo Berta
dc.contributor.authorOteng‐Fripong Richard
dc.contributor.authorOzimati Alfred
dc.contributor.authorDurodola Owoade
dc.contributor.authorCarlos F. Quiros
dc.contributor.authorJuan Carlos Rosas
dc.contributor.authorRukundo Placide
dc.contributor.authorPieter Rutsaert
dc.contributor.authorSibomana Milindi
dc.contributor.authorSharma Neeraj
dc.contributor.authorShida Nestory
dc.contributor.authorSteinke Jonathan
dc.contributor.authorSsali Reuben
dc.contributor.authorSuchini Jose Gabriel
dc.contributor.authorBéla Teeken
dc.contributor.authorTheophilus Kwabla Tengey
dc.contributor.authorTufan Hale Ann
dc.contributor.authorTumwegamire Silver
dc.contributor.authorTuyishime Elyse
dc.contributor.authorUlzen Jacob
dc.contributor.authorMuhammad Lawan Umar
dc.contributor.authorOnwuka Samuel
dc.contributor.authorUgo Madu Tessy
dc.contributor.authorRachel C. Voss
dc.contributor.authorMary Yeye
dc.contributor.authorMainassara Zaman‐Allah
dc.date.accessioned2026-05-04T07:14:35Z
dc.date.issued2024-01-25
dc.description.abstractMatching crop varieties to their target use context and user preferences is a challenge faced by many plant breeding programs serving smallholder agriculture. Numerous participatory approaches proposed by CGIAR and other research teams over the last four decades have attempted to capture farmers’ priorities/preferences and crop variety field performance in representative growing environments through experimental trials with higher external validity. Yet none have overcome the challenges of scalability, data validity and reliability, and difficulties in capturing socio-economic and environmental heterogeneity. Building on the strengths of these attempts, we developed a new data-generation approach, called triadic comparison of technology options (tricot). Tricot is a decentralized experimental approach supported by crowdsourced citizen science. In this article, we review the development, validation, and evolution of the tricot approach, through our own research results and reviewing the literature in which tricot approaches have been successfully applied. The first results indicated that tricot- aggregated farmer-led assessments contained information with adequate validity and that reliability could be achieved with a large sample. Costs were lower than current participatory approaches. Scaling the tricot approach into a large on-farm testing network successfully registered specific climatic effects of crop variety performance in representative growing environments. Tricot’s recent application in plant breeding networks in relation to decision-making has (i) advanced plant breeding lines recognizing socio-economic heterogeneity, and (ii) identified consumers’ preferences and market demands, generating alternative breeding design priorities. We review lessons learned from tricot applications that have enabled a large scaling effort, which should lead to stronger decision-making in crop improvement and increased use of improved varieties in smallholder agriculture.
dc.description.sponsorshipOpen access funding provided by Inland Norway University Of Applied Sciences This work was implemented by the CGIAR Research Programs on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security (CCAFS), and the CGIAR Research Program on Roots, Tubers and Bananas (RTB), which were carried out with support from the CGIAR Trust Fund and through bilateral funding agreements (details are athttps://www.cgiar.org/funders). More financial support was obtained during projects supported by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation: Accelerated Varietal Improvement and Seed Systems in Africa (AVISA, INV-009649), Seed Production Technology for Africa Phase II (SPTA II, INV-018951), NextGen Cassava (INV-007637), RTBfoods (INV-008567), and 1000FARMS (INV-031561). Part of this research was supported by the US Agency for International Development (Cooperative Agreement AID-OAA-F-14-00035). The research received financial support from McKnight Foundation Grant CCRP 16-832-098, German Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development Contract 81194988, and the Indian Council of Agricultural Research Annual Workplan.
dc.identifier.citationde Sousa, K., van Etten, J., Manners, R. et al. The tricot approach: an agile framework for decentralized on-farm testing supported by citizen science. A retrospective. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 44, 8 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-023-00937-1
dc.identifier.other10.1007/s13593-023-00937-1
dc.identifier.urihttps://researchspace.naro.go.ug/handle/123456789/503
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherAgronomy for Sustainable Development
dc.subjectExternal validity
dc.subjectParticipatory plant breeding
dc.subjectSocio-economic heterogeneity
dc.subjectTarget product profile
dc.titleThe tricot approach: an agile framework for decentralized on‐farm testing supported by citizen science. A retrospective
dc.typeArticle

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
The tricot approach an agile framework for decentralized.pdf
Size:
2.58 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed to upon submission
Description:

Collections