Agronomic and economic benefits of rice–sweetpotato rotation in lowland rice cropping systems in Uganda

dc.contributor.authorKyalo Gerald
dc.contributor.authorSrinivasulu Rajendran
dc.contributor.authorAlibu Simon
dc.contributor.authorZziwa Simon
dc.contributor.authorMcEwan Margaret
dc.contributor.authorEkobu Moses
dc.contributor.authorOkello E. A. Stella
dc.contributor.authorNamanda Sam
dc.contributor.authorOtim H. Michael
dc.contributor.authorLamo Jimmy
dc.contributor.authorMwanga O. M. Robert
dc.contributor.authorJan W. Low
dc.date.accessioned2026-03-06T05:54:13Z
dc.date.issued2024-12-07
dc.description.abstractA crop rotation study was conducted in the Agoro Rice scheme from mid-2015 to 2017 to determine the effect of sweetpotato–rice rotation in the lowlands on financial returns and sweetpotato root, sweetpotato vine, and rice yields compared to monocropping. Treatments included crop rotations of sweetpotato–rice–sweetpotato, rice– sweetpotato–rice, rice–rice–rice (control), and sweetpota- to–sweetpotato–sweetpotato (control). The study used the sweetpotato varieties NASPOT 11 (cream-fleshed), NASPOT 10 O, and Ejumula (both orange-fleshed) and the rice vari- eties Wita 9, Agoro, and Komboka. The results showed that mean sweetpotato root yields in the rotation treatment were significantly higher (28 t ha−1) than the control (19.8 t ha−1), representing a 47% gain in yield. Generally, the percentage gain in yield across years due to rotation ranged from 3 to 132%, depending on the variety. The total number of vine cuttings was significantly different between treatments and seasons (P < 0.001). Mean rice paddy yields in rotation were 8–35% higher than the control. The higher yields of sweet- potato in the rotation can be attributed to the rotation crop benefitting from residual fertilizers applied in rice in the previous season, while rice in the rotation crop could have benefited from the land preparation and establishment of the sweetpotato fields. The benefit of rotation for both crops varied by variety while the revenue-to-cost ratio varied by season and crop variety. Revenue-to-cost ratios for rotation and control treatments were greater than 1, indicating net profits were positive for both. The rotation generated 0.43 times more revenue than rice monocropping. Both rotation and monocropping systems generated profits, but rotation was 43% more profitable. In other words, if mono- cropping generates 1 dollar, rotation generates 1.43 dollars. The study concludes that rotation of sweetpotato with rice led to (1) increased yields of both rice and sweetpotatoes, (2) more profitable utilization of land, (3) enhanced availability of sweetpotato planting material at the beginning of the upland growing season, and (4) reduced the cost of land preparation for the main rice crop. Findings from this study show that there is great potential for diversification of rice- based cropping systems in Uganda, which will contribute to building sustainable food systems.
dc.description.sponsorshipThis research was coordinated by the International Potato Center and National Agricultural Research Organisation (NARO) Uganda as part of the CGIAR Research Program on Roots, Tubers, and Bananas (RTB), Sweetpotato Action for Security and Health in Africa, and CGIAR Seed Equal Initiative. It is supported by CGIAR Trust Fund contributors (http://www.cgiar.org/funders/).
dc.identifier.other10.1515/opag-2022-0369
dc.identifier.urihttps://researchspace.naro.go.ug/handle/123456789/325
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherDE GRUYTER
dc.subjectproductivity
dc.subjectprofitability
dc.subjectrice
dc.subjectrotation
dc.subjectsweet- potato
dc.subjectvine multiplication
dc.titleAgronomic and economic benefits of rice–sweetpotato rotation in lowland rice cropping systems in Uganda
dc.typeArticle

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Agronomic and economic benefits of rice–sweetpotato rotation in lowland rice cropping systems in Uganda.pdf
Size:
2.4 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed to upon submission
Description:

Collections