Optimizing training set size and marker density for genomic prediction of phytic acid and trypsin inhibitors in soybean (Glycine max.)

dc.contributor.authorNorberto Jose Palange
dc.contributor.authorTonny Obua
dc.contributor.authorJulius Pyton Sserumaga
dc.contributor.authorIsaac Onziga Dramadri
dc.contributor.authorEphraim Nuwamanya
dc.contributor.authorMoses Matovu
dc.contributor.authorMildred Ochwo Ssemakula
dc.contributor.authorRichard Edema
dc.contributor.authorPhinehas Tukamuhabwa
dc.date.accessioned2026-10-06T08:53:49Z
dc.date.issued2025-08-14
dc.description.abstractGenomic prediction accuracy is highly influenced by training set size (TSS) and marker density (MD). However, determining the optimal TSS and MD remains trait and model specific. This study assessed the optimum TSS, MD, and statistical models for predicting phytic acid and total trypsin inhibitors (TTI) using a mid-density SNP panel from 308 soybean genotypes. Parametric models, Genomic Best Linear Unbiased Prediction (G-BLUP), Ridge Regression Best Linear Unbiased Prediction (RR-BLUP), Bayes A, B, C, Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO), and Elastic Net, and non-parametric (Random Forest) models were evaluated across training set proportions (0.5–0.9) and marker densities (0.05–1.0). Random Forest consistently outperformed the parametric models in terms of predictive accuracy. The highest prediction for phytic acid was achieved at an 80:20 training-to-test ratio (R2 = 0.95; RPD = 2.81), whereas TTI prediction peaked at the same ratio (R2 = 0.97; RPD = 2.54). Across traits, TSS between 0.5 and 0.9 exhibited minimal differences, and MD above 50% provided negligible gains in model performance. Optimal predictions were TSS of 0.7–0.8, MD of 1.0 for phytic acid, and TSS of 0.5 MD of 0.8 TTI. These findings emphasize the importance of assessing TSS, MD, and prediction models to specific traits for efficient integration into breeding programs.
dc.description.sponsorshipThe Regional Scholarship and Innovation Fund of the Partnership for Skills in Applied Sciences, Engineering, and Technology (RSIF-PASET) and the Carnegie Corporation of New York funded this work. The Genotyping cost was co-funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation [grant number OPP1093174] and the Integrated Genotyping Sequence Support (IGSS) project.
dc.identifier.citationPalange NJ, Obua T, Sserumaga JP et al. Optimizing training set size and marker density for genomic prediction of phytic acid and trypsin inhibitors in soybean ( Glycine max.) [version 1] VeriXiv 2025, 2:230 https://doi.org/10.12688/verixiv.1793.1
dc.identifier.uri10.12688/verixiv.1793.1
dc.identifier.urihttps://researchspace.naro.go.ug/handle/123456789/580
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherVerixiv
dc.subjectanti-nutritional factors
dc.subjectgenomic predictions
dc.subjectmarker density
dc.subjectRandom Forest
dc.subjecttraining set size
dc.titleOptimizing training set size and marker density for genomic prediction of phytic acid and trypsin inhibitors in soybean (Glycine max.)
dc.typeArticle

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Optimizing training set size and marker density for genomic prediction of phytic acid and trypsin inhibitors in soybean (Glycine max.).pdf
Size:
798 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed to upon submission
Description:

Collections