Assessing Herbicide Use and Hand Weeding Efficacy in Groundnut Production Intensification

dc.contributor.authorPaul Anguria
dc.contributor.authorEssegbemon Akpo
dc.contributor.authorChris O. Ojiewo
dc.contributor.authorMichael A. Ugen
dc.date.accessioned2025-03-17T11:41:25Z
dc.date.available2025-03-17T11:41:25Z
dc.date.issued2025-03-15
dc.description.abstractPoor and costly weed management constrains Groundnut (Arachis hypogea L.) production in Uganda. A field study was therefore conducted at the National Semi-Arid Resources Research Institute (NaSARRI), Serere, Uganda during the long rains of 2020 and 2021 and short rains of 2020 to evaluate the efficacy of hand weeding and different herbicides on weed management, yield, and the economics of their use in groundnut. The experiment for this study comprised 7 treatments constituted by six herbicides; four pre-emergent (Glyphosate, Clethodim, S-Metolachlar, and 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid), and two post-emergent (Bentazone and Quizalofop-p-ethyl) and hand weeding. Post-emergence herbicide application and hand weeding were done at 30, 45, and 60 DAS. The treatments were laid out in a randomized complete block design (RCBD) with three replications. Calculated weed indices show the effect of weed control measures on groundnut weeds. Pre-emergence application of glyphosate followed by post-emergence application of Quizalofop-p-ethyl produced superior pod yield (1724.3 kg/ha), the lowest weed density of grass (0.62), and Sedges (0.61), the lowest weed biomass at harvest (122.5g), the highest percentage of weed control efficiency (69.65%), and highest net returns (7,937,746UGX/ha). However, post-emergence sole application of quizalofop-p-ethyl produced the highest B: C ratio (36.49). Therefore, this study has indicated that the pre-emergence application of glyphosate followed by the post-emergence application of quizalofop-p-ethyl is the most profitable weed control measure in groundnut; while the post-emergence sole application of quizalofop-p-ethyl is the most economical. Hand weeding though may be used where labour is cheap and not scarce as opposed to the herbicides.
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work was supported by BMGF Foundation through AVISA project that was being led by ICRISAT, Nairobi.
dc.identifier.issn1916-9752
dc.identifier.issn1916-9760 (Online)
dc.identifier.urihttp://104.225.218.216/handle/123456789/226
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherJournal of Agricultural Science
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United Statesen
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/
dc.subjectweed indices
dc.subjectweed control efficiency
dc.subjectgroundnut production intensification
dc.subjectweed biomass
dc.titleAssessing Herbicide Use and Hand Weeding Efficacy in Groundnut Production Intensification
dc.typeArticle

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Assessing Herbicide Use and Hand Weeding Efficacy in Groundnut Production Intensification.pdf
Size:
1.18 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed to upon submission
Description:

Collections